The Wuhan Institute of Virology, where the Wuhan CCP Virus is most likely to have originated, is a biosafety level 4 laboratory. That certification level means it is the most dangerous kind of facility for biocontainment on the planet. Despite this, in 2018, Trump’s U.S. Embassy officials warned America and the Dr. Fauci’s NIH on two occasions about poor lab safety after a visit in 2018. They even went so far as to specifically say that bat-based coronavirus research at the lab represented the risk of a new SARS-like pandemic.
But, that didn’t stop Anthony Fauci from funding at least $600,000 of additional extremely dangerous gain-of-function research there using hundreds of thousands of your taxpayer dollars while subverting any of the allegedly legally required scrutiny by their independent oversight board.
Are Fuaci and his NIAID and NIH scientists or ideologues bent on doing whatever they please to get whatever they want, regardless of the consequences for humanity?
“An oversight board created to scrutinize research that would enhance highly dangerous pathogens did not review a National Institutes of Health grant that funded a lab in Wuhan, China, to genetically modify bat-based coronaviruses.
Experts say the NIH grant describes scientists conducting gain-of-function research, a risky area of study that, in this case, made SARS-like viruses even more contagious. Federal funding for gain-of-function research was temporarily suspended in 2014 due to widespread scientific concerns it risked leaking supercharged viruses into the human population.
Federal funding for gain-of-function research was resumed in late 2017 after the Potential Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight (P3CO) Framework was formed within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The review board is tasked with critically evaluating whether grants that involve enhancing dangerous pathogens, such as coronaviruses, are worth the risks and that proper safeguards are in place.
But the NIH subagency that awarded the grant to the nonprofit group EcoHealth Alliance to study Chinese bat coronaviruses opted against forwarding it to the P3CO committee, an NIH spokesperson told the Daily Caller News Foundation, meaning the research received federal funding without an independent review by the HHS board.
“This is a systemic problem,” Rutgers University professor of chemical biology Richard H. Ebright told the DCNF, referring to the loophole in the review framework.
Ebright said the offices of the director for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — the subagency that funded EcoHealth — and the NIH have “systematically thwarted–indeed systematically nullified–the HHS P3CO Framework by declining to flag and forward proposals for review.”
An NIH spokesperson said its subagency did not flag the EcoHealth grant for independent review by the HHS review committee.
lated bat coronaviruses by making ones with pandemic potential, either through genetic engineering or passaging, or both,” Drs. Jonathan Latham and Allison Wilson wrote in June.
The NIH terminated the EcoHealth grant in April 2020. NIH deputy director for extramural research, Michael Lauer, told the group in a letter that the agency “does not believe that the current project outcomes align with the program goals and agency priorities.”
Fauci said during a hearing before the House Energy & Commerce Committee in June that the EcoHealth grant was canceled “because the NIH was told to cancel it.”
“I don’t know the reason, but we were told to cancel it,” Fauci said.
Fauci told Politico following the hearing that former President Donald Trump’s White House ordered the NIH to cancel the grant.”
The Full report on this by Andrew Kerr is very detailed and can be found here.
ARTICLE SOURCE : 100PERCENTFEEDUP.COM